On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:05:38PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/28/2013 09:12 AM, Christopher Larson wrote:
From: Christopher Larson
From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
Currently we don't enable any immodules for gtk+3, yet we unconditionally call
do_split_packages on a nonexistent path. This results in a return value of
None, which it then tries to join, resulting in a TypeError. Only split the
modules if we have
On 08/28/2013 09:12 AM, Christopher Larson wrote:
From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
Currently we don't enable any immodules for gtk+3, yet we unconditionally call
do_split_packages on a nonexistent path. This results in a return value of
None, which it then tries to join,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/28/2013 09:12 AM, Christopher Larson wrote:
From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
Currently we don't enable any immodules for gtk+3, yet we unconditionally
call
do_split_packages on a nonexistent path.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:05:38PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/28/2013 09:12 AM, Christopher Larson wrote:
From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
Currently we don't enable any immodules for gtk+3,
