Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency

2012-10-08 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 19:32 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > > On 8 October 2012 19:01, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:44 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > >> > which has already been submitted upstream: > >> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-October/028514

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 8 October 2012 19:01, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:44 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: >> > which has already been submitted upstream: >> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-October/028514.html > > Thanks for that, sending something upstream was on my todo

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency

2012-10-08 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:44 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 7 October 2012 12:10, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On 5 October 2012 21:47, Richard Purdie > > wrote: > >> We don't want the cairo dependency. Unfortunately simply checking whether > >> its present > >> isn't good enough. If its not in DEPEN

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency

2012-10-07 Thread Daniel Stone
On 7 October 2012 12:10, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 5 October 2012 21:47, Richard Purdie > wrote: >> We don't want the cairo dependency. Unfortunately simply checking whether >> its present >> isn't good enough. If its not in DEPENDS, it can disappear half way through >> building. >> We therefore

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency

2012-10-06 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Richard, On 5 October 2012 21:47, Richard Purdie wrote: > We don't want the cairo dependency. Unfortunately simply checking whether its > present > isn't good enough. If its not in DEPENDS, it can disappear half way through > building. > We therefore need to explicitly disable it. > > Signed

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency

2012-10-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 12:54 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 12:47 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm/nocairo.patch > > b/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm/nocairo.patch > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000..f9b7f3a > > --- a/dev/

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency

2012-10-05 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > We don't want the cairo dependency. Unfortunately simply checking whether its > present > isn't good enough. If its not in DEPENDS, it can disappear half way through > building. > We therefore need to explicitly disable it. > > Signed-off-b

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency

2012-10-05 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 12:47 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm/nocairo.patch > b/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm/nocairo.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 000..f9b7f3a > --- a/dev/null > +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm/nocairo.patch > @@ -0,

[OE-core] [PATCH] libdrm: Explicitly disable the cairo dependency

2012-10-05 Thread Richard Purdie
We don't want the cairo dependency. Unfortunately simply checking whether its present isn't good enough. If its not in DEPENDS, it can disappear half way through building. We therefore need to explicitly disable it. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm