On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:20:41PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:17 AM, wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm chipping in since I've been messing with these things a bit in upstream
> > Linux kernel.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 06:37:52AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:20:41PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:17 AM, wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm chipping in since I've been messing with these things a bit in upstream
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:20:41PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:17 AM, wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm chipping in since I've been messing with these things a bit in upstream
> > Linux kernel.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 06:37:52AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:17 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm chipping in since I've been messing with these things a bit in upstream
> Linux kernel.
>
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 06:37:52AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:46 AM, André Draszik
Hi,
I'm chipping in since I've been messing with these things a bit in upstream
Linux kernel.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 06:37:52AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:46 AM, André Draszik wrote:
> > connman is not doing anything wrong here.
> >
>
> yes I am aware
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:46 AM, André Draszik wrote:
> connman is not doing anything wrong here.
>
yes I am aware of this
> The kernel is redefining IFF_LOWER_UP, because it thinks the libc doesn't
> define it yet (and glibc doesn't).
>
> libc-compat.h is the way to solve
connman is not doing anything wrong here.
The kernel is redefining IFF_LOWER_UP, because it thinks the libc doesn't
define it yet (and glibc doesn't).
libc-compat.h is the way to solve these kind of issues. There also is https:
//lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/12/238 which is very similar. I'll pick that
I would rather fix the package instead of kernel headers unless kernel
community accepts this patch
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:14 AM André Draszik wrote:
> From: André Draszik
>
> musl _does_ define IFF_LOWER_UP DORMANT ECHO so we should
> prevent
From: André Draszik
musl _does_ define IFF_LOWER_UP DORMANT ECHO so we should
prevent redefinition of these when on musl.
As per the included patch, this can be triggered by
(from connman 6to4.c):
include
include
include
include
include
include