I'm torn over this, I can see someone wanting this to vary in each
build. What pushed me to believe its incorrect in its current form
is that it changes for every MACHINE build, making a complete mess
if you try and generate package feeds using it.
The alternative would be to give up on allarch in
On 25/08/15 17:58, Richard Purdie wrote:
I'm torn over this, I can see someone wanting this to vary in each
build. What pushed me to believe its incorrect in its current form
is that it changes for every MACHINE build, making a complete mess
if you try and generate package feeds using it.
It's
On Wednesday 26 August 2015 09:41:17 Joshua Lock wrote:
> On 25/08/15 17:58, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > I'm torn over this, I can see someone wanting this to vary in each
> > build. What pushed me to believe its incorrect in its current form
> > is that it changes for every MACHINE build, making a c
