[OE-core] [PATCH] package_rpm.bbclass: respect package overrides for the main package

2020-05-25 Thread Michael Ho
From: Michael Ho Apply ${PN} to OVERRIDES when determining the base package spec variables. Without this, there is a mismatch in behaviour where overrides for the base package have no effect while overrides for subpackages do. The subpackages should not be affected by this override as they apply

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] package_rpm.bbclass: respect package overrides for the main package

2020-05-26 Thread Steve Sakoman
Does this patch (and the follow-on series) make sense for inclusion in dunfell? Steve On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 9:46 PM Michael Ho wrote: > > From: Michael Ho > > Apply ${PN} to OVERRIDES when determining the base package spec variables. > Without this, there is a mismatch in behaviour where over

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] package_rpm.bbclass: respect package overrides for the main package

2020-05-28 Thread Michael Ho
Hi Steve, Not sure if that question was for me or the general community. I think the follow-on series fixing the sstate-caching might be nice in dunfell but I'd defer judgement to the community about this one as it's about changing a behavior in the recipes and I don't know what LTS guidelines

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] package_rpm.bbclass: respect package overrides for the main package

2020-05-28 Thread Steve Sakoman
Hi Michael, On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 1:30 AM wrote: > Not sure if that question was for me or the general community. I think the > follow-on series fixing the sstate-caching might be nice in dunfell but I'd > defer judgement to the community about this one as it's about changing a > behavior i