Hi Richard,
I see I'm too late and the patch is already reverted. I'll
update it and push again later then.
Thanks,
Ruslan
On 07/25/2018 06:44 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
Whilst we merged this, it has unfortunately totally broken uninative-
tarball. We're under pressure to update to a new uninat
Whilst we merged this, it has unfortunately totally broken uninative-
tarball. We're under pressure to update to a new uninative to unbreak
builds on recent distros with sstate sharing and this now blocks doing
so.
I can't add the value to the relocate_sdk.py call from
uninative.bbclass since I do
IMHO this is a solid improvement that should go in.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:09 AM Ruslan Bilovol via Openembedded-core <
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Any comments on this patch?
>
> Thanks
> Ruslan
>
> On 11/22/2017 01:20 PM, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> > This patc
Hi all,
Any comments on this patch?
Thanks
Ruslan
On 11/22/2017 01:20 PM, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
This patch removes hardcodes added to relocate_sdk.py
during SDK build, making it flexible and reusable.
Now default SDK path is passed to the script as
parameter rather then harcoded inside it.
Th
This patch removes hardcodes added to relocate_sdk.py
during SDK build, making it flexible and reusable.
Now default SDK path is passed to the script as
parameter rather then harcoded inside it.
This allows to reuse this script for multiple
relocations, and adds possibility to relocate
SDK multipl
