Hi Gary,
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 07:11 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2015-09-15 07:05, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> > Some (host) systems only have a binary named 'gpg' (e.g. Fedora) while
> > some only have 'gpg2' (Ubuntu) and others have both of them (openSUSE).
> > Currently the behavior of rpm-nati
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:58 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/15/15 8:05 AM, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> > Some (host) systems only have a binary named 'gpg' (e.g. Fedora) while
> > some only have 'gpg2' (Ubuntu) and others have both of them (openSUSE).
> > Currently the behavior of rpm-native
On 9/15/15 8:05 AM, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> Some (host) systems only have a binary named 'gpg' (e.g. Fedora) while
> some only have 'gpg2' (Ubuntu) and others have both of them (openSUSE).
> Currently the behavior of rpm-native with regards to GnuPG depends on
> the host platform: rpm(-native) is
On 2015-09-15 07:05, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
Some (host) systems only have a binary named 'gpg' (e.g. Fedora) while
some only have 'gpg2' (Ubuntu) and others have both of them (openSUSE).
Currently the behavior of rpm-native with regards to GnuPG depends on
the host platform: rpm(-native) is confi
Some (host) systems only have a binary named 'gpg' (e.g. Fedora) while
some only have 'gpg2' (Ubuntu) and others have both of them (openSUSE).
Currently the behavior of rpm-native with regards to GnuPG depends on
the host platform: rpm(-native) is configured to use GnuPG binary of the
host system i
