Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] runqemu: Extend to support genericx86* machine types

2013-12-02 Thread Burton, Ross
On 2 December 2013 18:28, Saul Wold wrote: > I believe that this is fairly doable in the x86 space since the compiler > setup and kernel configurations are almost identical, sound and nfs are > missing from the generic configuration. > > This will also help our CI on the autobuilder since it will

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] runqemu: Extend to support genericx86* machine types

2013-12-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 11/22/2013 06:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Saul Wold wrote: >>> >>> I have done some very basic testing to boot to graphics and run some >>> graphics >>> programs. The genericx86* currently do not have S

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] runqemu: Extend to support genericx86* machine types

2013-12-02 Thread Saul Wold
On 11/22/2013 06:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Saul Wold wrote: I have done some very basic testing to boot to graphics and run some graphics programs. The genericx86* currently do not have Sound or NFSD support enabled which qemux86* kernel do. There might be

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] runqemu: Extend to support genericx86* machine types

2013-11-22 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > I have done some very basic testing to boot to graphics and run some graphics > programs. The genericx86* currently do not have Sound or NFSD support enabled > which qemux86* kernel do. There might be some other bits needed, I am working > to f

[OE-core] [PATCH] runqemu: Extend to support genericx86* machine types

2013-11-22 Thread Saul Wold
I have done some very basic testing to boot to graphics and run some graphics programs. The genericx86* currently do not have Sound or NFSD support enabled which qemux86* kernel do. There might be some other bits needed, I am working to figure that out. [YOCTO #5105] Signed-off-by: Saul Wold