On 28 August 2013 07:44, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
meta-systemd currently has a bbappend which provides just a cover
for udev-systemd, if we move this to the recipe proper then the
bbappend can be removed from that layer
If we do this for systemd we should do it for all recipes that
On Tuesday 03 September 2013 11:20:18 Burton, Ross wrote:
On 28 August 2013 07:44, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
meta-systemd currently has a bbappend which provides just a cover
for udev-systemd, if we move this to the recipe proper then the
bbappend can be removed from that layer
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 28 August 2013 07:44, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
meta-systemd currently has a bbappend which provides just a cover
for udev-systemd, if we move this to the recipe proper then the
bbappend can be removed from
meta-systemd currently has a bbappend which provides just a cover
for udev-systemd, if we move this to the recipe proper then the
bbappend can be removed from that layer
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_206.bb | 5 -
1 file changed, 4
