Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] testimage: regenerate rootfs before testing

2015-05-01 Thread Burton, Ross
On 23 April 2015 at 19:47, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: This was discussed long ago and there are two different tasks as a compromise. testimage_auto runs automatically after a rootfs is built and has the correct dependencies. testimage is triggered manually. The

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] testimage: regenerate rootfs before testing

2015-04-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 14:25 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 23 April 2015 16:02:45 Burton, Ross wrote: On 23 April 2015 at 12:20, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote: I can't remember for certain, but I suspect the lack of this dependency was intentional, so that

[OE-core] [PATCH] testimage: regenerate rootfs before testing

2015-04-23 Thread Cristian Iorga
While starting a test with testimage, changes of the image under test don't trigger a rebuild, so fix that. Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga cristian.io...@intel.com --- meta/classes/testimage.bbclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/testimage.bbclass

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] testimage: regenerate rootfs before testing

2015-04-23 Thread Burton, Ross
On 23 April 2015 at 12:20, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote: I can't remember for certain, but I suspect the lack of this dependency was intentional, so that you could e.g. copy in an image built elsewhere and run tests on it. Maybe we can take the decision we don't need

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] testimage: regenerate rootfs before testing

2015-04-23 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 23 April 2015 09:39:08 Cristian Iorga wrote: While starting a test with testimage, changes of the image under test don't trigger a rebuild, so fix that. Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga cristian.io...@intel.com --- meta/classes/testimage.bbclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] testimage: regenerate rootfs before testing

2015-04-23 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 23 April 2015 16:02:45 Burton, Ross wrote: On 23 April 2015 at 12:20, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote: I can't remember for certain, but I suspect the lack of this dependency was intentional, so that you could e.g. copy in an image built elsewhere and run