于 2013年08月27日 02:13, Saul Wold 写道:
On 08/26/2013 11:06 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com
mailto:s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 10:56 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
What exactly is the problem for beagle board?
The QA team did not
On 8/28/2013 11:50 AM, Randy MacLeod wrote:
On 13-08-27 07:29 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 22:08 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:57:09PM -0400, Randy MacLeod wrote:
On 13-08-23 05:48 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 11:06 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com
mailto:s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 10:56 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
What exactly is the
On Aug 27, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Randy MacLeod randy.macl...@windriver.com wrote:
Just curious...
I dont' see a good reason to specify the git protocol twice:
git:// and ; protocol=git
since its explicit. it does provide readability benefits which does have value
when newbies read the
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Thanks for the contribution.
Looks my first contribution which is in then! Yay, thanks. :)
-- Laszlo
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
On 13-08-23 05:48 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 27 +++
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb | 23 +++
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
create mode
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Randy MacLeod
randy.macl...@windriver.comwrote:
Am I missing something or are people just copying and pasting the text?
I was just copying and pasting it.
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:57:09PM -0400, Randy MacLeod wrote:
On 13-08-23 05:48 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 27
+++
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb | 23
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 22:08 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:57:09PM -0400, Randy MacLeod wrote:
On 13-08-23 05:48 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 27
On 13-08-27 07:29 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 22:08 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:57:09PM -0400, Randy MacLeod wrote:
On 13-08-23 05:48 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
On 08/23/2013 09:57 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Any update? It would be nice not to miss the freeze ... ;-)
This has been merged, and I was informed by the QA team that it works
correctly for the mpc8315e-rdb and beagleboard, but NOT the beagleboard XM.
So maintaining this as DEFAULT_PREFERENCE =
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 10:56 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
What exactly is the problem for beagle board?
The QA team did not provide the details.
I wonder if you could ask for that?
___
On 08/26/2013 11:06 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com
mailto:s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 10:56 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
What exactly is the problem for beagle board?
The QA team did not provide the details.
I
I can confirm this also works with the Gumstix Overo in a layer bbappend
that used SRC_URI_append_overo for additional patches. Thanks to you
both for getting it merged.
I did come up with a question, though. The recipe uses:
PV = v2013.07+git${SRCPV}
which creates an informative but
This email contains some nuances, so I will try to reply to the main points
(IMO).
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Peter A. Bigot p...@pabigot.com wrote:
Is there reason to create a parallel UBOOT_VERSION?
Yes. fw-utils is not available with this u-boot version just yet. Also, I
have not
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Peter A. Bigot p...@pabigot.com wrote:
I can confirm this also works with the Gumstix Overo in a layer bbappend
that used SRC_URI_append_overo for additional patches. Thanks to you both
for getting it merged.
I did come up with a question, though. The recipe
I do not think my u-boot work is welcome, so I will withdraw this one, too.
I submitted the version before, without deleting the old variants, then
some people told me they should be removed as it was tested that the new
version should work.
Now, it has again been argued on IRC that it should
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 27 +++
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb | 23 +++
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Any update? It would be nice not to miss the freeze ... ;-)
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 27
+++
On 08/23/2013 09:57 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Any update? It would be nice not to miss the freeze ... ;-)
I had some networking issues this morning, and I am pulling together
patches now. This was build on the Autobuilders last night and there a
a problem with meta-fsl-ppc-lsb build, I am not
On 08/23/2013 02:56 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 08/23/2013 09:57 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Any update? It would be nice not to miss the freeze ... ;-)
I had some networking issues this morning, and I am pulling together
patches now. This was build on the Autobuilders last night and there a
a
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2011.06.bb | 28
...Drop-config.h-include-in-tools-imximage.h.patch | 39 --
...ove-LDSCRIPT-processing-to-the-top-level-.patch | 82 --
Please provide feedback. I would like to get this into poky 1.5. Thanks!
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2011.06.bb | 28
Hi,
On 15/08/13 05:25, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2013.07.bb | 26 +
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 27
++
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb
OK, thanks.
Seems fw-utils is broken, and I do not know how to fix it... So do not
approve.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jack Mitchell m...@communistcode.co.ukwrote:
Hi,
On 15/08/13 05:25, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2013.07.bb | 26 +
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 27 ++
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb | 25
3 files
On 08/06/2013 01:39 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Which poky version have you used?
Laszlo, I am working against master.
Sau!
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
mailto:lp...@kde.org wrote:
Yes, of course I tested it, but unfortunately I do not have any free
time in
On 08/03/2013 02:17 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2013.07.bb | 26 +
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 27 ++
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb
On 08/03/2013 02:17 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2013.07.bb | 26 +
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 27 ++
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2013.07.bb | 26 +
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 27 ++
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb | 25
3 files
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
Please reword the commit. You're not updating it but adding 2013.07 version.
Personally I'd prefer to update for 2013.07 and drop previous
releases. To support the update, I've been using
It is updating the latest version while also preserving the option of using
an earlier one.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.brwrote:
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
Please reword
On 08/03/2013 11:12 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
It is updating the latest version while also preserving the option of
using an earlier one.
As has been mentioned both on the IRC and here to various other patches
that update without out removing the older version, we ask why is the
older version
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 08/03/2013 11:12 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
It is updating the latest version while also preserving the option of
using an earlier one.
As has been mentioned both on the IRC and here to various other patches that
update
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2013.07.bb | 28 +
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 29 ++
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb | 26 +++
3 files changed,
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2013.07.bb | 28 +
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 29 ++
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2013.07.bb | 26 +++
3 files changed,
On 31 July 2013 14:16, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2013.07.bb | 28 +
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2013.07.bb | 29
++
Just for the record as I already wrote, there are files already around, and
I would not like to screw up anyone's work and use because I do not know
why they are around. However, that should not be blocking people who need
the new features for their software to operate.
Anyway, I would like to
38 matches
Mail list logo
