Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-20 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Tue 2016-12-20 @ 03:16:54 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 20 December 2016 at 15:14, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > > So I only have the version 5 -config scripts, but my host has version 5 and > > version 6 -config scripts. I'm guessing we need a dummy ncurses{w}6-config > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-20 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Tue 2016-12-20 @ 10:14:01 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > So I only have the version 5 -config scripts, but my host has version 5 and > version 6 -config scripts. I'm guessing we need a dummy ncurses{w}6-config > script in the sysroot too (?) YES! Going into my sysroot and creating v6 -config

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On 20 December 2016 at 15:14, Trevor Woerner wrote: > So I only have the version 5 -config scripts, but my host has version 5 and > version 6 -config scripts. I'm guessing we need a dummy ncurses{w}6-config > script in the sysroot too (?) > Yeah, that seems like a good

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-20 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Tue 2016-12-20 @ 03:05:20 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 20 December 2016 at 15:00, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > This would be the autoconf macro UL_NCURSES_CHECK in m4/ul.m4, which calls > > ncurses6-config. I thought the sysroot was ahead of the host so it should > > find

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On 20 December 2016 at 15:00, Burton, Ross wrote: > This would be the autoconf macro UL_NCURSES_CHECK in m4/ul.m4, which calls > ncurses6-config. I thought the sysroot was ahead of the host so it should > find our broken script before the hosts... > $ bitbake -e

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On 20 December 2016 at 14:55, Trevor Woerner wrote: > The biggest one is probably the last one (line 8662) where something is > setting NCURSES_CFLAGS explicitly to /usr/include. I'm looking for that one > now. > This would be the autoconf macro UL_NCURSES_CHECK in m4/ul.m4,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-20 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Tue 2016-12-20 @ 02:41:21 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 19 December 2016 at 22:12, Khem Raj wrote: > > > checking ncursesw... (v6) yes > > > > I'm pretty sure this indicates that it found a ncursesw-config binary, > which we disable. So it must be running the host tool.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On 19 December 2016 at 22:12, Khem Raj wrote: > checking ncursesw... (v6) yes > I'm pretty sure this indicates that it found a ncursesw-config binary, which we disable. So it must be running the host tool. I'm seeing if we can force it to use the sysroot easily now. Ross

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On 19 December 2016 at 22:12, Khem Raj wrote: > its detecting ncurses > > checking ncursesw... (v6) yes > checking ncursesw/ncurses.h usability... yes > checking ncursesw/ncurses.h presence... yes > checking for ncursesw/ncurses.h... yes > checking for ncurses.h... (cached)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-19 Thread Khem Raj
its detecting ncurses checking ncursesw... (v6) yes checking ncursesw/ncurses.h usability... yes checking ncursesw/ncurses.h presence... yes checking for ncursesw/ncurses.h... yes checking for ncurses.h... (cached) yes checking for use_default_colors in -lncursesw... yes checking for resizeterm

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-19 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Definitely works here: :-( >> Can you share the do_configure log? sure, attached log.do_configure Description: Binary data -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-19 Thread Burton, Ross
Definitely works here: $ rm tmp-glibc/ -rf ; bitbake util-linux-native -C unpack Parsing recipes: 100% |#| Time: 0:00:04 Parsing of 866 .bb files complete (0 cached, 866 parsed). 1321 targets, 68

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-19 Thread Burton, Ross
On 19 December 2016 at 21:42, Trevor Woerner wrote: > A fresh build in a new directory fails readily: > Ah, interesting, because I can't replicate that. :/ Can you share the do_configure log? Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-19 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Mon 2016-12-19 @ 08:31:25 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 19 December 2016 at 15:23, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > > Is anyone else seeing build failures as a result of this commit? > > > > Can you reproduce this on demand? Yes. Last night's raspi2 and minnow/turbot builds

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-19 Thread Burton, Ross
On 19 December 2016 at 15:23, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Is anyone else seeing build failures as a result of this commit? > Can you reproduce this on demand? Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-19 Thread Trevor Woerner
Is anyone else seeing build failures as a result of this commit? ... [lots of lines omitted] ... | cfdisk.c:(.text+0x207b): undefined reference to `_nc_stdscr' | cfdisk.c:(.text+0x20a4): undefined reference to `_nc_stdscr' | cfdisk.c:(.text+0x2268): undefined

[OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: 2.28.1 -> 2.29

2016-12-12 Thread Zheng Ruoqin
Upgrade util-linux from 2.28.1 to 2.29 Signed-off-by: Zheng Ruoqin --- .../util-linux/{util-linux_2.28.1.bb => util-linux_2.29.bb} | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-core/util-linux/{util-linux_2.28.1.bb =>