Send the patch in to oe-core with Upstream-Status: Submitted, and
hopefully we can drop it shortly.
Ross
On 13 June 2018 at 15:32, Jeremy A. Puhlman wrote:
> Okay I did some test builds and nuking the libdir lines worked fine.
>
> The patch is submitted here:
> https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-
Okay I did some test builds and nuking the libdir lines worked fine.
The patch is submitted here:
https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2018-June/057123.html
It wasn't rejected out of hand. Did you want me to roll a update to this
with the submitted
patch, or did you want to wait to see how
I'd recommend deleting the libdir lines in every .pc file (and pushing
the patch upstream).
Ross
On 11 June 2018 at 17:19, Jeremy A. Puhlman wrote:
>
>
> On 6/11/2018 3:23 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>
>> Upstream will (and do) argue that $datadir is the right location as
>> these headers are archi
On 6/11/2018 3:23 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
Upstream will (and do) argue that $datadir is the right location as
these headers are architecture-independent.
Would the package manager do the right thing if the files didn't have
the libdir line in, so where bit-identical?
Yes, if the files are b
Upstream will (and do) argue that $datadir is the right location as
these headers are architecture-independent.
Would the package manager do the right thing if the files didn't have
the libdir line in, so where bit-identical?
Ross
On 10 June 2018 at 20:01, Jeremy Puhlman wrote:
> * --data dir c
* --data dir config option is only used to install pkgconfig
* Installing into ${datadir} causes mutlilib conficts on install
file /usr/share/pkgconfig/applewmproto.pc conflicts between attempted
installs of lib32-xorgproto-dev-2018.4-r0.i586 and
xorgproto-dev-2018.4-r0.corei7_64
file /usr/sha
