Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

2016-10-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 16:02 +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote: > On 19-10-16 14:53, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > > > On 18 October 2016 at 22:21, Paul Eggleton > el.com > > > wrote: > > > > > > Q: Do I need to declare a runtime dependency that typically > > c

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

2016-10-19 Thread Burton, Ross
On 19 October 2016 at 15:02, Mike Looijmans wrote: > busybox could RRPOVIDE tar? >> > > If we go down that road, we'd end up with a busybox that RPROVIDES a > hundred and one utilities. I doubt anyone will be happy with that... > Well, only for the utilities which are separately packaged and gen

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

2016-10-19 Thread Mike Looijmans
On 19-10-16 14:53, Burton, Ross wrote: On 18 October 2016 at 22:21, Paul Eggleton mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com>> wrote: > > Q: Do I need to declare a runtime dependency that typically comes > > from busybox (tar)? > > Yes, because some people try to eliminate busybox fr

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

2016-10-19 Thread Burton, Ross
On 18 October 2016 at 22:21, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > Q: Do I need to declare a runtime dependency that typically comes > > > from busybox (tar)? > > > > Yes, because some people try to eliminate busybox from their image. > > How would one express such a dependency though, given that it could c

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

2016-10-18 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:13:11 Randy MacLeod wrote: > On 2016-10-14 02:31 PM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > > Piglit was removed because the current version was making sdk > > images too large. This patchset reduces the installed size by 1.5GB > > and adds piglit back to core-tools-testapps. > > > > Runni

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

2016-10-18 Thread Randy MacLeod
On 2016-10-14 02:31 PM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: Piglit was removed because the current version was making sdk images too large. This patchset reduces the installed size by 1.5GB and adds piglit back to core-tools-testapps. Running piglit still requires the same amount of space so in practice this

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Re-add piglit to sdk images

2016-10-14 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
Piglit was removed because the current version was making sdk images too large. This patchset reduces the installed size by 1.5GB and adds piglit back to core-tools-testapps. Running piglit still requires the same amount of space so in practice this is useful for installed images only. Q: Do I ne