On 01/19/2016 08:34 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 16-01-05 08:12 AM, Ming Liu wrote:
In current initramfs bundled kernel packaging policy, there are several
dependency chains co-existing:
| "core-image-minimal.do_build" ->
"core-image-minimal.do_bundle_initramfs"
|
On 01/19/2016 10:37 PM, Ming Liu wrote:
On 01/19/2016 08:34 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 16-01-05 08:12 AM, Ming Liu wrote:
In current initramfs bundled kernel packaging policy, there are several
dependency chains co-existing:
| "core-image-minimal.do_build" ->
On 16-01-05 08:12 AM, Ming Liu wrote:
In current initramfs bundled kernel packaging policy, there are several
dependency chains co-existing:
| "core-image-minimal.do_build" -> "core-image-minimal.do_bundle_initramfs"
| "core-image-minimal.do_bundle_initramfs" ->
On 2016-01-19 4:37 PM, Ming Liu wrote:
On 01/19/2016 08:34 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 16-01-05 08:12 AM, Ming Liu wrote:
In current initramfs bundled kernel packaging policy, there are several
dependency chains co-existing:
| "core-image-minimal.do_build" ->
Hi, Bruce:
No problem, thanks for letting me know the status.
//Ming Liu
2016-01-14 18:06 GMT+01:00 Bruce Ashfield :
> Just bumping this review to let you know that I haven't forgotten
> about it.
>
> I've been looking at the details at least twice now, but
Just bumping this review to let you know that I haven't forgotten
about it.
I've been looking at the details at least twice now, but haven't
managed to sort everything out.
I'll pick this up again shortly.
Bruce
On 16-01-05 08:12 AM, Ming Liu wrote:
In current initramfs bundled kernel
In current initramfs bundled kernel packaging policy, there are several
dependency chains co-existing:
| "core-image-minimal.do_build" -> "core-image-minimal.do_bundle_initramfs"
| "core-image-minimal.do_bundle_initramfs" ->
"virtual/kernel.do_bundle_initramfs"
|