[OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] uclibc config cleanup

2011-06-30 Thread Khem Raj
We do not need machine configs or even arch configs since we construct the bits in .inc files. Once anamoly is mips where we do not use default ARCH for o32 which is mips1 but we use mips32 so thats the reason we have a separate config for mips. Additionally fix boot issue found on mips which were

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] uclibc config cleanup

2011-06-30 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 01:06 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > We do not need machine configs or even arch configs since we construct the > bits > in .inc files. Once anamoly is mips where we do not use default ARCH for o32 > which is mips1 but we use mips32 so thats the reason we have a separate config > f

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] uclibc config cleanup

2011-06-30 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 01:06 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> We do not need machine configs or even arch configs since we construct the >> bits >> in .inc files. Once anamoly is mips where we do not use default ARCH for o32 >> which is mips1 but w

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] uclibc config cleanup

2011-06-30 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 16:36 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 01:06 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> We do not need machine configs or even arch configs since we construct the > >> bits > >> in .inc files. Once anamoly is mips w