Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/7] buildhistory fixes

2012-02-21 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/14/2012 05:40 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: Analysis of the recent output from buildhistory on the Yocto Project and Angstrom autobuilders showed a few anomalies and annoyances; this set of patches addresses all of the ones I noticed. The following changes since commit e5ad03093dfc4364d1407183f

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/7] buildhistory fixes

2012-02-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 17 February 2012 11:36:37 Paul Eggleton wrote: > I've got one more patch to add to this, please ignore this set as v2 is on > its way. Actually scratch that, as mentioned in another thread I got stuck on a pseudo issue; please merge this series. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel O

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/7] buildhistory fixes

2012-02-17 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 14 February 2012 13:40:10 Paul Eggleton wrote: > Analysis of the recent output from buildhistory on the Yocto Project and > Angstrom autobuilders showed a few anomalies and annoyances; this > set of patches addresses all of the ones I noticed. I've got one more patch to add to this, ple

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/7] buildhistory fixes

2012-02-14 Thread Paul Eggleton
Analysis of the recent output from buildhistory on the Yocto Project and Angstrom autobuilders showed a few anomalies and annoyances; this set of patches addresses all of the ones I noticed. The following changes since commit e5ad03093dfc4364d1407183f458df79f347c7a1: guile: fix cross configure