From: Bruce Ashfield
Richard,
Here's the -stable and config changes that i've been collecting for
a bit.
As discussed on the list/IRC/technical calls, I'll drop 6.5 and
introduce 6.6 and the matching libc-headers in early January.
I've been testing with 6.6 for some time, and haven't found any
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 12:55 PM Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
>
> Hello Bruce,
>
> I got this: Unable to find revision 867a6bdef9701f378f5a9ce66a713daa22598649
> in branch yocto-6.5
> This seems correct, did you forget to push anything?
I just replied to Steve.
It's my new machine having different d
Hello Bruce,
I got this: Unable to find revision 867a6bdef9701f378f5a9ce66a713daa22598649 in
branch yocto-6.5
This seems correct, did you forget to push anything?
On 04/12/2023 23:26:55-0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> From: Bruce Ashfield
>
> Richard,
>
> Here's my latest -stable updates for 6.
From: Bruce Ashfield
Richard,
Here's my latest -stable updates for 6.1 and 6.5 as well as the bump
of the dev kernel to v6.7
I have more pending changes: the 6.6 reference kernel and associated
libc-headers updates, as well as the eventual drop of 6.1 from the
tree.
But this is my first full c
From: Bruce Ashfield
Richard,
I'm starting to watch v5.19 as the kernel for the fall release, but in
the meantime, here are the 5.10 and 5.15 -stable udpates, along with
some configuration tweaks.
The merges were a bit messy on -rt with some /dev/random changes being
backported that caused sign
From: Bruce Ashfield
Richard,
Here's the set of -stable commits that I've had queued. I ran through a-quick
on the AB and it came back green:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/85/builds/1197
Cheers,
Bruce
The following changes since commit 520e95902f12feac2850e0c24167
Hi all,
Here's the next round of -stable and -dev kernel updates. I've also included
khem's gcc8 fixes in this round, so we should be good to go from the kernel
point of view on that front.
As usual, I built and booted this as much as possible, but there are a lot
of combos to cover. If there are
On 03/29/2018 09:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 08:58 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
There's the stack validation warning, but I can run the hellomod
test on my qemux86-64 target and the 4.14 kernel.
It is an incremental patch to linux-yocto_4.14 to add the
dependencies.
Woul
On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 08:58 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> There's the stack validation warning, but I can run the hellomod
> test on my qemux86-64 target and the 4.14 kernel.
>
> It is an incremental patch to linux-yocto_4.14 to add the
> dependencies.
>
> Would you like the entire queue again,
There's the stack validation warning, but I can run the hellomod
test on my qemux86-64 target and the 4.14 kernel.
It is an incremental patch to linux-yocto_4.14 to add the dependencies.
Would you like the entire queue again, or just the new patch sent to
the list ?
Bruce
-
Makefile:9
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 28 March 2018 at 13:01, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>> Also a non-musl target failed like this:
>>>
>>> | NOTE: FAIL [6.426s]: test_kernel_module (kernelmodule.KernelModuleTest)
>>> | NOT
On 28 March 2018 at 13:01, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> Also a non-musl target failed like this:
>>
>> | NOTE: FAIL [6.426s]: test_kernel_module (kernelmodule.KernelModuleTest)
>> | NOTE:
>> --
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Also a non-musl target failed like this:
>
> | NOTE: FAIL [6.426s]: test_kernel_module (kernelmodule.KernelModuleTest)
> | NOTE: --
> | NOTE: Traceback (most recent call last)
Also a non-musl target failed like this:
| NOTE: FAIL [6.426s]: test_kernel_module (kernelmodule.KernelModuleTest)
| NOTE: --
| NOTE: Traceback (most recent call last):
| File
"/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nig
I think it was this pull but musl builds are now failing like this in selftest:
| NOTE: FAIL: test_kernel_module (kernelmodule.KernelModuleTest)
| NOTE: --
| NOTE: Traceback (most recent call last):
| File
"/home/pokybuild/yoct
Hi all,
This pull request is a series of -stable updates (more Spectre/meltdown
included), and some fixes for the fsl_mpc h/w reference board that will
allow us to update the reference to v4.14+.
We also have a configuration tweak to the wifi fragments, which will
result in more reuse, but won't
Hi all,
I sent some of these previously, but I kept them in this pull request since
the changes are all incremental.
New in this pull request are 4.8.10 and the introduction of 4.9-rcX as the
linux-yocto-dev kernel.
Bruce
The following changes since commit 7c3a47ed8965c3a3eb90a9a4678d5caedbba63
Richard,
This pull request covers configuration and BSP fixes that I've been
gathering for 3.19 and 3.14.
There are two minor Yocto bug fixes as well:
linux-yocto-custom: clarify bbappend versus copy in comments
linux-yocto: drop suggestion of devshell for patch failures
This doesn't conta
Hi all,
Some parts of this request are repeated from one I sent a while ago, since
they didn't make it into the tree.
These are the release 1.7 kernel updates. For 3.10 and 3.14 they represent
the pickup of -stable fixes (in particular CVEs) and -rt fixes.
For 3.17, we follow the march to the r
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 8 September 2014 20:55, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
>> I'm on the road for the next three days, but wanted to get this out for
>> a preview before being a bit unresponsive, and to let others apply and build
>> these if they want.
>
> Just noti
On 8 September 2014 20:55, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> I'm on the road for the next three days, but wanted to get this out for
> a preview before being a bit unresponsive, and to let others apply and build
> these if they want.
Just noticed this. I'll pull these into my mut and see what the
autobuil
Richard/Saul,
Here's the next round of linux-yocto* changes for the 1.7 release. The
notable update here, is the introduction of the 3.17-rcX kernel via both
linux-yoct-dev and a named recipe (which uses the same -dev tree for
now).
I've built and booted all the qemu BSPs on this tree, using the
22 matches
Mail list logo
