On 04/16/2012 03:45 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
It was recently noticed that many packages that use update-alternatives were
not setting package level provides. So a package that required /usr/bin/env
would not be satisfied by coreutils, even though it had a /usr/bin/env
alternative.
The first patch
On 17.04.2012 09:03, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 17 apr. 2012, om 00:45 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
>
>> It was recently noticed that many packages that use update-alternatives were
>> not setting package level provides. So a package that required /usr/bin/env
>> would not be satisfied
Op 17 apr. 2012, om 00:45 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
> It was recently noticed that many packages that use update-alternatives were
> not setting package level provides. So a package that required /usr/bin/env
> would not be satisfied by coreutils, even though it had a /usr/bin/en
It was recently noticed that many packages that use update-alternatives were
not setting package level provides. So a package that required /usr/bin/env
would not be satisfied by coreutils, even though it had a /usr/bin/env
alternative.
The first patch in the series adds the enhanced alternatives
