On 5 September 2014 11:21, Enrico Scholz
wrote:
>> Maybe systemd-networkd and its constituent pieces need to be pulled
>> out as a separate package?
>
> Yes; I think this is necessary. systemd gets larger and larger with
> each release and is providing functionality which is either not needed
> (
"Peter A. Bigot" writes:
> Maybe systemd-networkd and its constituent pieces need to be pulled
> out as a separate package?
Yes; I think this is necessary. systemd gets larger and larger with
each release and is providing functionality which is either not needed
(logind, the network stuff, nspa
On 4 September 2014 20:30, Peter A. Bigot wrote:
> Further investigation suggests that systemd-networkd is intended to do the
> same sort of thing as connman, though so maybe I need to shoot that instead.
>
> I have no answers, but just wanted to note that there now appears to be some
> conflict b
On 09/02/2014 05:53 AM, Chen Qi wrote:
Upgrade systemd from 213 to 216.
This broke me, because by 216 systemd started managing /etc/resolv.conf
which is fine except that it uses a static configuration in
/etc/systemd/resolved.conf, whereas in the 213 days I was getting
/etc/resolv.conf manag
Upgrade systemd from 213 to 216.
systemd-older-kernel.patch is removed as it's fixed in 216.
0001-uClibc-doesn-t-implement-pwritev-preadv.patch is removed because
the file it patches has been removed from the project.
0001-util-Including-missing.h-to-get-MAX_HANDLE_SZ.patch is removed because
it
