On 10/12/2017 04:20 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:33:53PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
Perf is the preferred solution, and oprofile is difficult to
maintain against musl.
Can we consider moving it to meta-openembed
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:33:53PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>> Perf is the preferred solution, and oprofile is difficult to
>> maintain against musl.
>
> Can we consider moving it to meta-openembedded and maybe relaxing
> requireme
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:33:53PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> Perf is the preferred solution, and oprofile is difficult to
> maintain against musl.
Can we consider moving it to meta-openembedded and maybe relaxing
requirements, such as musl compatibility?
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanav
Perf is the preferred solution, and oprofile is difficult to
maintain against musl.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
---
meta/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc | 1 -
meta/conf/layer.conf | 1 -
meta/recipes-kernel/oprofile/oprofile.inc | 6
