On 6/24/11 3:51 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On (24/06/11 14:42), Mark Hatle wrote:
>> The latest cross-prelink version tracks the prelink r190 SVN.
>>
>> Fix two minor issues as well. If we remove the package, we would
>> unprelink the filesystem after the rm was finished. This is
>> incorrect.. we nee
On (24/06/11 14:42), Mark Hatle wrote:
> The latest cross-prelink version tracks the prelink r190 SVN.
>
> Fix two minor issues as well. If we remove the package, we would
> unprelink the filesystem after the rm was finished. This is
> incorrect.. we need to do this prerm.
>
> Move the cron and
The latest cross-prelink version tracks the prelink r190 SVN.
Fix two minor issues as well. If we remove the package, we would
unprelink the filesystem after the rm was finished. This is
incorrect.. we need to do this prerm.
Move the cron and cron configuration file to a new package split.
This
On 6/24/11 2:18 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 24 jun 2011, om 21:10 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
>
>> The latest cross-prelink version tracks the prelink r190 SVN.
>>
>> Fix two minor issues as well. If we remove the package, we would
>> unprelink the filesystem after the rm was finis
Op 24 jun 2011, om 21:10 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
> The latest cross-prelink version tracks the prelink r190 SVN.
>
> Fix two minor issues as well. If we remove the package, we would
> unprelink the filesystem after the rm was finished. This is
> incorrect.. we need to do this
The latest cross-prelink version tracks the prelink r190 SVN.
Fix two minor issues as well. If we remove the package, we would
unprelink the filesystem after the rm was finished. This is
incorrect.. we need to do this prerm.
Also disable the cron configuration file. This isn't appropriate
for
