Currently there's a limitation that Extensible SDKs can only be build on a
machine with the same architecture as the SDK.
However, SDKMACHINE defaults to x86-64, which means eSDKs cannot be built
out of the box on arm64 systems.
By defaulting SDKMACHINE to ${BUILD_ARCH} we generate SDKs for the build
host, so they'll always work out of the box.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@arm.com>
---
meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
index da6db9f595..92b6866d4d 100644
--- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
+++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ TARGET_CC_ARCH = "${TUNE_CCARGS}"
TARGET_LD_ARCH = "${TUNE_LDARGS}"
TARGET_AS_ARCH = "${TUNE_ASARGS}"
-SDKMACHINE ??= "x86_64"
+SDKMACHINE ??= "${BUILD_ARCH}"
SDK_OS = "${BUILD_OS}"
SDK_VENDOR = "-oesdk"
SDK_SYS = "${SDK_ARCH}${SDK_VENDOR}-${SDK_OS}"
--
2.25.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#146067):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/146067
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79153932/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
