Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] squashfs-tools: Enable LZO support

2014-08-11 Thread Mike Looijmans
On 08/11/2014 12:33 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 12:11 +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote: For systems looking for speed rather than size (e.g. booting from serial NOR flash) LZO is usually a good tradeoff, and usually boots faster than gzip or even an uncompressed filesystem. Sign

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] squashfs-tools: Enable LZO support

2014-08-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 12:11 +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote: > For systems looking for speed rather than size (e.g. booting from serial NOR > flash) LZO is usually a good tradeoff, and usually boots faster than gzip > or even an uncompressed filesystem. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans > --- > .../

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] squashfs-tools: Enable LZO support

2014-08-11 Thread Mike Looijmans
Sorry for having posted this multiple times, our local mail server bounced it as "spam" so I figured it never arrived, and retried it later. On 08/11/2014 12:11 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: For systems looking for speed rather than size (e.g. booting from serial NOR flash) LZO is usually a good

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] squashfs-tools: Enable LZO support

2014-08-11 Thread Mike Looijmans
For systems looking for speed rather than size (e.g. booting from serial NOR flash) LZO is usually a good tradeoff, and usually boots faster than gzip or even an uncompressed filesystem. Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans --- .../squashfs-tools/squashfs-tools_4.2.bb |4 ++-- 1 file chan

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] squashfs-tools: Enable LZO support

2014-08-11 Thread Mike Looijmans
For systems looking for speed rather than size (e.g. booting from serial NOR flash) LZO is usually a good tradeoff, and usually boots faster than gzip or even an uncompressed filesystem. Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans --- .../squashfs-tools/squashfs-tools_4.2.bb |4 ++-- 1 file chan