On 08/11/2014 12:33 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 12:11 +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
For systems looking for speed rather than size (e.g. booting from serial NOR
flash) LZO is usually a good tradeoff, and usually boots faster than gzip
or even an uncompressed filesystem.
Sign
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 12:11 +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> For systems looking for speed rather than size (e.g. booting from serial NOR
> flash) LZO is usually a good tradeoff, and usually boots faster than gzip
> or even an uncompressed filesystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans
> ---
> .../
Sorry for having posted this multiple times, our local mail server bounced it
as "spam" so I figured it never arrived, and retried it later.
On 08/11/2014 12:11 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote:
For systems looking for speed rather than size (e.g. booting from serial NOR
flash) LZO is usually a good
For systems looking for speed rather than size (e.g. booting from serial NOR
flash) LZO is usually a good tradeoff, and usually boots faster than gzip
or even an uncompressed filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans
---
.../squashfs-tools/squashfs-tools_4.2.bb |4 ++--
1 file chan
For systems looking for speed rather than size (e.g. booting from serial NOR
flash) LZO is usually a good tradeoff, and usually boots faster than gzip
or even an uncompressed filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans
---
.../squashfs-tools/squashfs-tools_4.2.bb |4 ++--
1 file chan