The code:
bb.fatal("foo1")
bb.fatal("foo2")

Would make the second one not work, use bb.error for first one to fix
the problem.

Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com>
---
 meta/classes/sstate.bbclass |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
index 403d6a0..f0f1731 100644
--- a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ def sstate_install(ss, d):
                 if search_output != "":
                     match.append("Matched in %s" % search_output.rstrip())
     if match:
-        bb.fatal("The recipe %s is trying to install files into a shared area 
when those files already exist. Those files and their manifest location are:\n  
 %s\nPlease verify which recipe should provide the above files.\nThe build has 
stopped as continuing in this scenario WILL break things, if not now, possibly 
in the future (we've seen builds fail several months later). If the system knew 
how to recover from this automatically it would however there are several 
different scenarios which can result in this and we don't know which one this 
is. It may be you have switched providers of something like virtual/kernel 
(e.g. from linux-yocto to linux-yocto-dev), in that case you need to execute 
the clean task for both recipes and it will resolve this error. It may be you 
changed DISTRO_FEATURES from systemd to udev or vice versa. Cleaning those 
recipes should again resolve this error however switching DISTRO_FEATURES on an 
existing build directory is not supported, you should re
 ally clean out tmp and rebuild (reusing sstate should be safe). It could be 
the overlapping files detected are harmless in which case adding them to 
SSTATE_DUPWHITELIST may be the correct solution. It could also be your build is 
including two different conflicting versions of things (e.g. bluez 4 and bluez 
5 and the correct solution for that would be to resolve the conflict. If in 
doubt, please ask on the mailing list, sharing the error and filelist above." % 
(d.getVar('PN', True), "\n   ".join(match)))
+        bb.error("The recipe %s is trying to install files into a shared area 
when those files already exist. Those files and their manifest location are:\n  
 %s\nPlease verify which recipe should provide the above files.\nThe build has 
stopped as continuing in this scenario WILL break things, if not now, possibly 
in the future (we've seen builds fail several months later). If the system knew 
how to recover from this automatically it would however there are several 
different scenarios which can result in this and we don't know which one this 
is. It may be you have switched providers of something like virtual/kernel 
(e.g. from linux-yocto to linux-yocto-dev), in that case you need to execute 
the clean task for both recipes and it will resolve this error. It may be you 
changed DISTRO_FEATURES from systemd to udev or vice versa. Cleaning those 
recipes should again resolve this error however switching DISTRO_FEATURES on an 
existing build directory is not supported, you should re
 ally clean out tmp and rebuild (reusing sstate should be safe). It could be 
the overlapping files detected are harmless in which case adding them to 
SSTATE_DUPWHITELIST may be the correct solution. It could also be your build is 
including two different conflicting versions of things (e.g. bluez 4 and bluez 
5 and the correct solution for that would be to resolve the conflict. If in 
doubt, please ask on the mailing list, sharing the error and filelist above." % 
(d.getVar('PN', True), "\n   ".join(match)))
         bb.fatal("If the above message is too much, the simpler version is 
you're advised to wipe out tmp and rebuild (reusing sstate is fine). That will 
likely fix things in most (but not all) cases.")
 
     # Write out the manifest
-- 
1.7.9.5

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to