On 12/04/2012 04:39 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 10:57 +0800, ChenQi wrote:
Hi Richard,
I saw that this series of patches have been merged except this one.
Is there any problem with this patch?
The thing is, if we don't fix autotool.bbclass like this, building
coreutils will
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 10:57 +0800, ChenQi wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I saw that this series of patches have been merged except this one.
> Is there any problem with this patch?
>
> The thing is, if we don't fix autotool.bbclass like this, building
> coreutils will fail with a long TMPDIR (bug#2766
Hi Richard,
I saw that this series of patches have been merged except this one.
Is there any problem with this patch?
The thing is, if we don't fix autotool.bbclass like this, building
coreutils will fail with a long TMPDIR (bug#2766). I tried to build
coretuils with TMPDIR of 200 char length,
From: Chen Qi
When the TMPDIR is very long, say, 410 characters, aclocal would
fail because the argument list is too long. This patch is an effort
to use relative path for acpaths whenever possible, aiming at
making the build system work correctly when the sanity check says OK.
With the current
From: Chen Qi
When the TMPDIR is very long, say, 410 characters, aclocal would
fail because the argument list is too long. This patch is an effort
to use relative path for acpaths whenever possible, aiming at
making the build system work correctly when the sanity check says OK.
With the current
