Thanks, I will work on it.
// Robert
On 08/19/2015 01:02 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 13:33, Burton, Ross mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com>> wrote:
There's been a related report on the yocto@ list where it was noticed that
we're executing the host rpcgen during glibc buil
On 17 August 2015 at 13:33, Burton, Ross wrote:
> There's been a related report on the yocto@ list where it was noticed
> that we're executing the host rpcgen during glibc builds, so consider
> this is a ping. :)
>
Filed #8181 so this doesn't get lost.
Ross
--
_
On 17 July 2015 at 05:45, Khem Raj wrote:
> it quashes the warning but doesnt fix underlying problem. this doesnt
> seem to be right thing to do in cross builds. We use cross-rpcgen to
> generate these files so this whole rpcgen run should be removed
> instead. Please test such a patch and correc
On 07/17/2015 12:45 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
The current warning is:
WARNING: glibc: unable to generate header for spray.x
Which is easier to debug than:
WARNING: unable to generate header for spray.x
And remove the file before generate it agai
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
> The current warning is:
> WARNING: glibc: unable to generate header for spray.x
>
> Which is easier to debug than:
> WARNING: unable to generate header for spray.x
>
> And remove the file before generate it again to fix the warning when
> recom
The current warning is:
WARNING: glibc: unable to generate header for spray.x
Which is easier to debug than:
WARNING: unable to generate header for spray.x
And remove the file before generate it again to fix the warning when
recompile:
file `bootparam_prot.h' already exists and may be overwritten
