Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] libiconv: Add recipes for 1.13.1

2011-07-20 Thread Henning Heinold
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:26:49AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 11:30 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Import 1.13.1 recipes from meta-oe > > share common code through libiconv.inc > > The big question this triggers for me is "why"? > > Deleting libtool.m4 certainly looks neater

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] libiconv: Add recipes for 1.13.1

2011-07-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 11:30 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> Import 1.13.1 recipes from meta-oe >> share common code through libiconv.inc > > The big question this triggers for me is "why"? are there any downside of using .inc files ? the code in

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] libiconv: Add recipes for 1.13.1

2011-07-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 11:30 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Import 1.13.1 recipes from meta-oe > share common code through libiconv.inc The big question this triggers for me is "why"? Deleting libtool.m4 certainly looks neater than this version of patching it out. Is that do_configure hack still needed