When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have
CONFIG_X86_X32=y.
This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the
KERNEL_FEATURES when x32 is the tuning for a given machine.
cc: Saul Wold
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield
---
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/
On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have
CONFIG_X86_X32=y.
This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the
KERNEL_FEATURES when x32 is the tuning for a given machine.
cc: Saul Wold
Signed-off-by:
On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have
CONFIG_X86_X32=y.
This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the
KERNEL_FEATURES when x32 is the tuning for a given
On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have
CONFIG_X86_X32=y.
This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the
KER
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >>> When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have
> >>> CONFIG_X86_X32=y.
> >>>
On 09/11/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 09:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >>> On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield w
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 09:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>> On 09/11/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>> >> On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> >>> On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Sa
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 08:58 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 09:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> >> >> On 09/11
