> Should this be a DISTRO or IMAGE FEATURE? I can see potential arguments for
> both sides, what was your thinking on choosing IMAGE over DISTRO?
this is IMAGE_FEATURE that can then be recommended/mandated in a distro policy
is upto distros
___
Openembe
On 08/31/2012 10:01 AM, Björn Stenberg wrote:
Saul Wold wrote:
You new patches still need patch headers with Upstream-Status and
Signed-off-by tags.
Ouch, sorry about that. I added Signed-off but forgot upstream. I'll be more
careful next time.
Just to be clear these need to be in your busyb
Saul Wold wrote:
> You new patches still need patch headers with Upstream-Status and
> Signed-off-by tags.
Ouch, sorry about that. I added Signed-off but forgot upstream. I'll be more
careful next time.
> Should this be a DISTRO or IMAGE FEATURE? I can see potential
> arguments for both sides, w
On 08/31/2012 07:10 AM, Björn Stenberg wrote:
Patch Makefile.in to allow test programs be built on host and ran on
target.
Patch tests/run-all to output PASS/FAIL for each testcase.
Patch recipe to contitionally build and install ptest.
Signed-off-by: Björn Stenberg
---
.../bash/bash-4.2/buil
Patch Makefile.in to allow test programs be built on host and ran on
target.
Patch tests/run-all to output PASS/FAIL for each testcase.
Patch recipe to contitionally build and install ptest.
Signed-off-by: Björn Stenberg
---
.../bash/bash-4.2/build-tests.patch| 34 +
