On Thursday 30 April 2015 11:26:34 Paul Eggleton wrote:
I just find the term full clone a bit misleading here. I somehow tend
to associate it with a mirrored clone / cloning all refs / cloning with
full history. Could the term used above be independent clone or
standalone clone or
Hi,
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:41 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
If -x is specified and the specified URI was a git repository, we need
to ensure that the resulting clone is a full clone and not one that has
pointers into the temporary fetch location or DL_DIR. Split out the code
from devtool that
Hi Markus,
On Thursday 30 April 2015 13:17:41 Markus Lehtonen wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:41 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
If -x is specified and the specified URI was a git repository, we need
to ensure that the resulting clone is a full clone and not one that has
pointers into the
If -x is specified and the specified URI was a git repository, we need
to ensure that the resulting clone is a full clone and not one that has
pointers into the temporary fetch location or DL_DIR. Split out the code
from devtool that already does this for devtool modify -x and reuse
that.
