Hi Anders,
from what I can see the problem is rooted a bit deeper, and this patch
(together with 5, 6, 7 from the series) is basically symptomatic:
the package.jsons license field is mostly expected to be spdx-compliant
(see https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package.json#license). So I think we
* Khem Raj [170303 02:18]:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Anders Darander wrote:
> > Quite a few npm packages declare MIT/X11 as their license. This is equal to
> > a pure MIT license.
> it would be good if you could attach a link where this can be
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Anders Darander wrote:
> Quite a few npm packages declare MIT/X11 as their license. This is equal to
> a pure MIT license.
it would be good if you could attach a link where this can be referred to.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anders Darander
Quite a few npm packages declare MIT/X11 as their license. This is equal to
a pure MIT license.
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander
---
scripts/lib/recipetool/create_npm.py | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/lib/recipetool/create_npm.py