Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 22/22] cmake: Use bb.fatal() instead of raising FuncFailed

2016-10-05 Thread Ulf Magnusson
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 22:26 +0200, Ulf Magnusson wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Ulf Magnusson >> wrote: >> > >> > This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to >> > perceived complexity and cargo culting. >> >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 22/22] cmake: Use bb.fatal() instead of raising FuncFailed

2016-10-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 22:26 +0200, Ulf Magnusson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Ulf Magnusson > wrote: > > > > This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to > > perceived complexity and cargo culting. > > > > Motivating quote below: > > > > < kergoth> the *original

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 22/22] cmake: Use bb.fatal() instead of raising FuncFailed

2016-10-05 Thread Ulf Magnusson
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Ulf Magnusson wrote: > This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to > perceived complexity and cargo culting. > > Motivating quote below: > > < kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via >whatever appropria

[OE-core] [PATCH 22/22] cmake: Use bb.fatal() instead of raising FuncFailed

2016-09-30 Thread Ulf Magnusson
This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to perceived complexity and cargo culting. Motivating quote below: < kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via whatever appropriate means, bb.fatal, whatever, and funcfailed was what y