On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
dbarysh...@gmail.com wrote:
As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation to
separate task from do_deploy. The only major feature of oe-core's
version (not to recreate uImage if it exists) is retained in this patch.
On 09/18/2011 02:25 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
This was nack'ed but I don't remember why; Richard?
This was nack'ed because that version of the patch didn't check
for existence of uImage built by kernel tree (not present in
oe-dev/meta-oe, added in oe-core as somebody had problems with
As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation to
separate task from do_deploy. The only major feature of oe-core's
version (not to recreate uImage if it exists) is retained in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
This was nack'ed but I don't remember why; Richard?
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 19:18, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
dbarysh...@gmail.com wrote:
As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation to
separate task from do_deploy. The only major feature of oe-core's
version (not to
