The following allows RPM to generate the SDK image, however without it
we get a failure because the system has nothing that provides /bin/sh.
Unfortunately the patch causes failures with ipk and deb packages because
they can not have filenames within their RPROVIDES. I'm looking for some
type of
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 19:17 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> The following allows RPM to generate the SDK image, however without it
> we get a failure because the system has nothing that provides /bin/sh.
>
> Unfortunately the patch causes failures with ipk and deb packages because
> they can not have f
On 8/2/11 8:46 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 19:17 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> The following allows RPM to generate the SDK image, however without it
>> we get a failure because the system has nothing that provides /bin/sh.
>>
>> Unfortunately the patch causes failures with ipk a
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 09:49 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 8/2/11 8:46 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 19:17 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> The following allows RPM to generate the SDK image, however without it
> >> we get a failure because the system has nothing that provides /bin
On 8/3/11 7:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 09:49 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 8/2/11 8:46 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 19:17 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
The following allows RPM to generate the SDK image, however without it
we get a failure becau
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:41 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 8/3/11 7:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 09:49 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> On 8/2/11 8:46 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 19:17 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> The following allows RPM to generat
On 8/3/11 10:40 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:41 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 8/3/11 7:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 09:49 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 8/2/11 8:46 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 19:17 -0500, Mark Hatle wrot
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 11:03 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 8/3/11 10:40 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:41 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> On 8/3/11 7:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 09:49 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 8/2/11 8:46 AM, Phil Blundell
