On 08/23/2017 02:31 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:58:21PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
There was a bug in the search routines responsible for locating
BSP definitions which returned a valid match if only the ktype
matched.
This meant that someone looking for
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:58:21PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> There was a bug in the search routines responsible for locating
> BSP definitions which returned a valid match if only the ktype
> matched.
>
> This meant that someone looking for "qemux86foo" (which is an
> invalid definition)
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 10:42 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On 08/23/2017 10:40 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Bruce Ashfield
>> > wrote:
>>
On 08/23/2017 10:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 10:42 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 08/23/2017 10:40 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 08/22/2017 11:40 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20,
On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 10:42 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 08/23/2017 10:40 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Bruce Ashfield
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 08/22/2017 11:40 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017
On 08/23/2017 10:40 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
On 08/22/2017 11:40 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
There was a bug in the search routines
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> On 08/22/2017 11:40 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Bruce Ashfield
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There was a bug in the search routines responsible for locating
>>>
On 08/22/2017 11:40 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
There was a bug in the search routines responsible for locating
BSP definitions which returned a valid match if only the ktype
matched.
This meant that someone looking
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> There was a bug in the search routines responsible for locating
> BSP definitions which returned a valid match if only the ktype
> matched.
>
> This meant that someone looking for "qemux86foo" (which is an
>
m>
> *Cc:* richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org; openembedded-core@lists.
> openembedded.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 8/9] kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid
> BSPs are built
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi.
rd.pur...@linuxfoundation.org; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 8/9] kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid BSPs
are built
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Bruce Ashfield
<bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com<mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21
nembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
>> > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
>> > Bruce Ashfield
>> > Sent: den 21 augusti 2017 04:58
>> > To: richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
>> > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
&g
ruce Ashfield
> > Sent: den 21 augusti 2017 04:58
> > To: richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
> > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH 8/9] kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid
> > BSPs are built
> >
> > There was a bug i
ists.openembedded.org
> Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH 8/9] kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid
> BSPs are built
>
> There was a bug in the search routines responsible for locating
> BSP definitions which returned a valid match if only the ktype
> matched.
>
> This meant
There was a bug in the search routines responsible for locating
BSP definitions which returned a valid match if only the ktype
matched.
This meant that someone looking for "qemux86foo" (which is an
invalid definition) would potentially end up building "qemuarm"
and be none the wiser (until it
15 matches
Mail list logo