Hi, Khem:
Just tried, but the error still could be observed with the patch
applied, for instance:
|
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Ming Liu wrote:
> Hi, Burton:
>
> I also agree with you, your suggestion is better.
>
> Hi, Khem:
>
> But is this a bug of binutils? Or musl libc? Since I had only observed this
> error with musl libc only, it did not occur with glibc.
>
Hi, Burton:
I also agree with you, your suggestion is better.
Hi, Khem:
But is this a bug of binutils? Or musl libc? Since I had only observed this
error with musl libc only, it did not occur with glibc.
//Ming Liu
2017-07-24 15:39 GMT+02:00 Khem Raj :
> On Mon, Jul 24,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> If we're going to silently change the linker to bfd under musl if ld-is-gold
> is selected, wouldn't it be better just to throw an exception if both musl
> and ld-is-gold are selected? Better to tell the user so they
If we're going to silently change the linker to bfd under musl if
ld-is-gold is selected, wouldn't it be better just to throw an exception if
both musl and ld-is-gold are selected? Better to tell the user so they can
not do that than silently ignore what they asked.
Ross
On 22 July 2017 at
From: Ming Liu
Quite a few such compiling issues were found when I was building with
following configs:
...
MACHINE = "beaglebone"
TCLIBC = "musl"
DISTRO_FEATURES_append = " ld-is-gold"
...
fixed by adding bfd binding now ldflags.
Signed-off-by: Ming Liu