On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 09:44 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Patrick Ohly > > +LICENSE = "GPLv3"
>>
>> Perhaps GPL-3.0-with-autoconf-exception would be more accurate here.
>
> I wasn't sure whether such a thing exis
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 09:44 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Patrick Ohly > +LICENSE = "GPLv3"
>
> Perhaps GPL-3.0-with-autoconf-exception would be more accurate here.
I wasn't sure whether such a thing existed already, but yes, as it does
it could be used here, with CO
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> The COPYING file specifies pure GPLv3, not GPLv2 & GPLv3. There is
> also the COPYING.EXCEPTION file with the autotools exception, which
> gets ignored here in the recipe to keep it simpler.
>
> All of the explicit dependencies seem unnecessar
The COPYING file specifies pure GPLv3, not GPLv2 & GPLv3. There is
also the COPYING.EXCEPTION file with the autotools exception, which
gets ignored here in the recipe to keep it simpler.
All of the explicit dependencies seem unnecessary, and RDEPENDS_${PN}
doesn't do anything for native recipes ei