On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 12:19 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2017 at 11:54:32 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > To me it seems like the right solution. Inheriting
> > release-source.bbclass could be limited to builds which produce
> > releases, for example in your CI setup, then
On Monday 13 February 2017 at 11:54:32 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 18:32 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 February 2017 at 17:24:39 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 13:48 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 08 February 2017 at
On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 18:32 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> On Thursday 09 February 2017 at 17:24:39 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 13:48 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 08 February 2017 at 14:04:42 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> The part I'd missed is the all-important
On Thursday 09 February 2017 at 17:24:39 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 13:48 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 February 2017 at 14:04:42 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 11:50 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> > > > On Friday 13 January 2017 at
On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 13:48 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 February 2017 at 14:04:42 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 11:50 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> > > On Friday 13 January 2017 at 15:52:33 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > > The right solution is to inject
On Wednesday 08 February 2017 at 14:04:42 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 11:50 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> > On Friday 13 January 2017 at 15:52:33 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > The right solution is to inject do_rm_work before do_build and after
> > > all tasks of the recipe.
On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 11:50 +, Mike Crowe wrote:
> On Friday 13 January 2017 at 15:52:33 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > Having do_rm_work depend on do_build had one major disadvantage:
> > do_build depends on the do_build of other recipes, to ensure that
> > runtime dependencies also get
On Friday 13 January 2017 at 15:52:33 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Having do_rm_work depend on do_build had one major disadvantage:
> do_build depends on the do_build of other recipes, to ensure that
> runtime dependencies also get built. The effect is that when work on a
> recipe is complete and
Having do_rm_work depend on do_build had one major disadvantage:
do_build depends on the do_build of other recipes, to ensure that
runtime dependencies also get built. The effect is that when work on a
recipe is complete and it could get cleaned up, do_rm_work still
doesn't run because it waits
