Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] u-boot-fw-utils: Fix broken makefile in v2017.11.

2017-12-15 Thread Kristian Amlie
>> Isn't it "Upstream-Status: Backport [URL]"? >> >> Also, what were the changes in v2 and v3 of this patch? > > Yes, it should be backport and the header is to be included in the > patch file, not on the commit log Sorry, I thought it was Accepted because there is not (yet) any official

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] u-boot-fw-utils: Fix broken makefile in v2017.11.

2017-12-14 Thread Otavio Salvador
Yes, it should be backport and the header is to be included in the patch file, not on the commit log On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > Isn't it "Upstream-Status: Backport [URL]"? > > Also, what were the changes in v2 and v3 of this patch? > > > On Wed,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] u-boot-fw-utils: Fix broken makefile in v2017.11.

2017-12-14 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
Isn't it "Upstream-Status: Backport [URL]"? Also, what were the changes in v2 and v3 of this patch? On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:52:29PM +0100, Kristian Amlie wrote: > See the patch for details. This patch has already been applied > upstream, but we need it for v2017.11. > > Upstream-Status:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] u-boot-fw-utils: Fix broken makefile in v2017.11.

2017-12-13 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:52:29PM +0100, Kristian Amlie wrote: > See the patch for details. This patch has already been applied > upstream, but we need it for v2017.11. > > Upstream-Status: Accepted > [http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=ded84f90a1066eef5f34daa4539273de64f7b811] > >

[OE-core] [PATCH v3] u-boot-fw-utils: Fix broken makefile in v2017.11.

2017-12-13 Thread Kristian Amlie
See the patch for details. This patch has already been applied upstream, but we need it for v2017.11. Upstream-Status: Accepted [http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=ded84f90a1066eef5f34daa4539273de64f7b811] Signed-off-by: Kristian Amlie ---