On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 11:39 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> As I said before ("Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v6 1/1] initramfs-framework:
> module to support boot live image" from July 31st), I consider it a
> mistake that support for live boot with all its dependencies was
> added directly to initramfs-framew
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 09:46 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Patrick Ohly > wrote:
>> > Let's not dig us deeper into this hole and instead split out the
>> > live
>> > boot module into its own, arch-specific r
On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 09:46 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > Let's not dig us deeper into this hole and instead split out the
> > live
> > boot module into its own, arch-specific recipe.
> >
> > Then initramfs-framework can become allarch wi
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 17:43 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> There is no COMPATIBLE_HOST in the recipe neither it makes sense for
>> this to be machine specific.
>>
>> Possibly, initramfs-framework's based modules may be machine specific
>> bu
On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 17:43 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> There is no COMPATIBLE_HOST in the recipe neither it makes sense for
> this to be machine specific.
>
> Possibly, initramfs-framework's based modules may be machine specific
> but if there is the case they can just RDEPENDS on
> initramfs
There is no COMPATIBLE_HOST in the recipe neither it makes sense for
this to be machine specific.
Possibly, initramfs-framework's based modules may be machine specific
but if there is the case they can just RDEPENDS on
initramfs-framework-base and provide the specific module as another
recipe.
Si
