On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 08:00:13PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 15:12 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>> >> Without this
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 08:00:13PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 15:12 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> >> Without this patch, linking fails with a missing implementation of
> >> yy_scan_string. This
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 15:12 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>> Without this patch, linking fails with a missing implementation of
>> yy_scan_string. This looks like a regression in flex, because 2.6.0 generated
>> different
On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 15:12 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Without this patch, linking fails with a missing implementation of
> yy_scan_string. This looks like a regression in flex, because 2.6.0 generated
> different code that called PrParser_scan_string
> resp. DtParser_scan_string.
>
> Working
Without this patch, linking fails with a missing implementation of
yy_scan_string. This looks like a regression in flex, because 2.6.0 generated
different code that called PrParser_scan_string
resp. DtParser_scan_string.
Working around that in acpica until this is better understood or fixed
in