Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v5 1/2] image.bbclass: add prohibited-paths QA test

2018-04-13 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Fabien Lahoudere wrote: > This patch doesn't seem to be applied. > Is there additional comments or something blocking? I see no reason for it not being applied. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.brhttp:/

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v5 1/2] image.bbclass: add prohibited-paths QA test

2018-04-13 Thread Fabien Lahoudere
Hi This patch doesn't seem to be applied. Is there additional comments or something blocking? Thanks Fabien On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 19:28 +, Martyn Welch wrote: > Sometimes we wish to ensure that files or directories are not installed > somewhere that may prove detrimental to the operation o

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v5 1/2] image.bbclass: add prohibited-paths QA test

2017-12-18 Thread Martyn Welch
This doesn't seem to be applied yet. Is there something else that is needed? Martyn On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 19:28 +, Martyn Welch wrote: > Sometimes we wish to ensure that files or directories are not installed > somewhere that may prove detrimental to the operation of the system. For > example

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v5 1/2] image.bbclass: add prohibited-paths QA test

2017-11-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Martyn Welch wrote: > Sometimes we wish to ensure that files or directories are not installed > somewhere that may prove detrimental to the operation of the system. For > example, this may be the case if files are placed in a directory that is > utilised as a mount

[OE-core] [PATCH v5 1/2] image.bbclass: add prohibited-paths QA test

2017-11-27 Thread Martyn Welch
Sometimes we wish to ensure that files or directories are not installed somewhere that may prove detrimental to the operation of the system. For example, this may be the case if files are placed in a directory that is utilised as a mount point at run time, thus making them inaccessible once when th