On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:40 AM Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Richard, Khem,
>
> > I was able to confirm that fts is in the recipe sysroot and that the
> > compile step is running "make -j 88 LIBC=musl LIBS=-lfts", i.e. its
> > being passed in to ltp. Beyond that I'm a little out my depth to know
> > h
Hi Richard, Khem,
> I was able to confirm that fts is in the recipe sysroot and that the
> compile step is running "make -j 88 LIBC=musl LIBS=-lfts", i.e. its
> being passed in to ltp. Beyond that I'm a little out my depth to know
> how/why its not ending up where it should unfortunately. At least
Hi Richard,
> Grep suggests LIBS is a configure option, not a makefile one. I tried:
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp_20200120.bb
> b/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp_20200120.bb
> index 847f267b0b7..5be9489a756 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp_20200120.bb
> +++ b/meta/recip
On 2/29/20 5:53 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 13:42 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 13:22 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 07:46 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
At least we know, that once we solve this problem, we can remove
0002-kernel-contr
On 2/28/20 10:46 PM, Petr Vorel wrote:
Hi Richard, Khem,
Changes v4->v5:
* Put back 0002-kernel-controllers-Link-with-libfts-explicitly-on-
mu.patch
as it still needed on MUSL (although it should not be needed,
strange).
Reported by Anuj Mittal
I'm sorry to say that this still isn't quite
On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 13:42 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 13:22 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 07:46 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > At least we know, that once we solve this problem, we can remove
> > > 0002-kernel-controllers-Link-with-libfts-explicit
On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 13:22 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 07:46 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > At least we know, that once we solve this problem, we can remove
> > 0002-kernel-controllers-Link-with-libfts-explicitly-on-mu.patch
> >
> > Please, how to reproduce this build local
On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 07:46 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> At least we know, that once we solve this problem, we can remove
> 0002-kernel-controllers-Link-with-libfts-explicitly-on-mu.patch
>
> Please, how to reproduce this build locally? Is it:
> . oe-init-build-env
> TCLIBC=musl bitbake ltp
Yes, th
Hi Richard, Khem,
> > Changes v4->v5:
> > * Put back 0002-kernel-controllers-Link-with-libfts-explicitly-on-
> > mu.patch
> > as it still needed on MUSL (although it should not be needed,
> > strange).
> > Reported by Anuj Mittal
> I'm sorry to say that this still isn't quite right for musl:
> h
Hi Petr,
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 18:57 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Removed ffsb copying file and associated runtest file fs_ext4
> (both removed in this release).
>
> Added LIBS=-lfts for MUSL.
>
> Removed patches (accepted upstream)
> * 0001-mkswap01.sh-Add-udevadm-trigger-before-swap-verifica.pat
Removed ffsb copying file and associated runtest file fs_ext4
(both removed in this release).
Added LIBS=-lfts for MUSL.
Removed patches (accepted upstream)
* 0001-mkswap01.sh-Add-udevadm-trigger-before-swap-verifica.patch
* 0001-testcases-fix-an-absent-format-string-issue.patch
* 0001-nm01-Remov
11 matches
Mail list logo
