From: Khem Raj [raj.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 2:41 PM
To: BURTON, ROSS
Cc: Radzykewycz, T (Radzy); Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 1/1] screen
From: Randy MacLeod [randy.macl...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 8:37 AM
To: Radzykewycz, T (Radzy)
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 1/1] screen: Upgrade 4.0.3 - 4.3.1
On 19 August 2015 at 09:17, Jussi Kukkonen
jussi.kukko...@intel.commailto:jussi.kukko...@intel.com
From: Randy MacLeod [randy.macl...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 8:37 AM
To: Radzykewycz, T (Radzy)
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 1/1] screen: Upgrade 4.0.3 - 4.3.1
On 19 August 2015 at 09:17, Jussi Kukkonen
jussi.kukko...@intel.commailto:jussi.kukko...@intel.com
On 20 August 2015 at 21:15, Radzykewycz, T (Radzy) ra...@windriver.com
wrote:
I would very much prefer that the GPLv2 license of screen be
maintained. What do I need to do to keep a GPLv2 license on
it ?
Basically you need to have a good reason why oe-core should invest the time
maintaining
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
Basically you need to have a good reason why oe-core should invest the time
maintaining both modern screen and ancient screen (4.0.3 was released in
2008). The easiest solution would be for your distro to maintain a
On 19 August 2015 at 09:17, Jussi Kukkonen jussi.kukko...@intel.com wrote:
* License is now GPLv3+
What about GPLv2 version which was preserved (IIRC) in prevous patch?
Why did you decide to drop it now?
Mostly because of Ross' comment Is screen considered sufficiently
core that we
On 18 August 2015 at 11:36, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 04:26:43PM +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
* License is now GPLv3+
What about GPLv2 version which was preserved (IIRC) in prevous patch?
Why did you decide to drop it now?
Mostly because of Ross'
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 04:26:43PM +0300, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
* License is now GPLv3+
What about GPLv2 version which was preserved (IIRC) in prevous patch?
Why did you decide to drop it now?
* Remove patches that are already in upstream or not applicable
anymore
* Add a patchset to
* License is now GPLv3+
* Remove patches that are already in upstream or not applicable
anymore
* Add a patchset to enable cross-compiling 4.3.1 (modified from
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43223)
Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen jussi.kukko...@intel.com
---
