Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] sysvinit: make pidof usuable in a standalone setting

2011-05-31 Thread Koen Kooi
No comments at all? Op 28 mei 2011, om 13:21 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende geschreven: Currently it's a symlink to killall5: $ dpkg-deb -c sysvinit-pidof_2.88dsf-r1_armv7a.ipk | grep pidof lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2011-05-27 11:05 ./bin/pidof.sysvinit - /sbin/killall5 The point

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] sysvinit: make pidof usuable in a standalone setting

2011-05-31 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 10:27 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: No comments at all? Patience ;-). It was a US/UK holiday yesterday and lots of people have been taking a long weekend. Personally, whilst I did merge a few things yesterday, this one didn't look that urgent so its on today's to look at and

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] sysvinit: make pidof usuable in a standalone setting

2011-05-31 Thread Phil Blundell
On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 13:21 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: The alternative is to just move 'killall5' into the pidof subpackage and to RDPEPENDS_${PN} += ${PN}-pidof I think I like that better. Duplicating the binary doesn't sound very desirable. For what it's worth, also note that: - busybox

[OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] sysvinit: make pidof usuable in a standalone setting

2011-05-28 Thread Koen Kooi
Currently it's a symlink to killall5: $ dpkg-deb -c sysvinit-pidof_2.88dsf-r1_armv7a.ipk | grep pidof lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2011-05-27 11:05 ./bin/pidof.sysvinit - /sbin/killall5 The point of the pidof subpackage was to have a pidof without needing sysvinit, this restores that