Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] udev: add udev-utils to RDEPENDS

2014-06-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 3 jun. 2014, om 08:58 heeft ChenQi qi.c...@windriver.com het volgende geschreven: On 02/03/2014 10:01 PM, David Nyström wrote: On mån 3 feb 2014 14:43:53, Phil Blundell wrote: On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 13:58 +0100, David Nyström wrote: An intended fix for below error message with

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] udev: add udev-utils to RDEPENDS

2014-06-05 Thread Saul Wold
On 06/02/2014 11:58 PM, ChenQi wrote: On 02/03/2014 10:01 PM, David Nyström wrote: On mån 3 feb 2014 14:43:53, Phil Blundell wrote: On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 13:58 +0100, David Nyström wrote: An intended fix for below error message with core-image-lsb, Sending this as an RFC since I dont really

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] udev: add udev-utils to RDEPENDS

2014-06-03 Thread ChenQi
On 02/03/2014 10:01 PM, David Nyström wrote: On mån 3 feb 2014 14:43:53, Phil Blundell wrote: On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 13:58 +0100, David Nyström wrote: An intended fix for below error message with core-image-lsb, Sending this as an RFC since I dont really know what constitutes a RRECOMMENDS vs.

[OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] udev: add udev-utils to RDEPENDS

2014-02-03 Thread David Nyström
An intended fix for below error message with core-image-lsb, Sending this as an RFC since I dont really know what constitutes a RRECOMMENDS vs. RDEPENDS. Is this clearly defined somewhere ? Below should be an RDEPENDS, no ? INIT: version 2.88 booting Starting udev udevd[59]: starting version

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] udev: add udev-utils to RDEPENDS

2014-02-03 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi David, On Monday 03 February 2014 13:58:49 David Nyström wrote: An intended fix for below error message with core-image-lsb, Sending this as an RFC since I dont really know what constitutes a RRECOMMENDS vs. RDEPENDS. Is this clearly defined somewhere ? Below should be an RDEPENDS, no ?

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] udev: add udev-utils to RDEPENDS

2014-02-03 Thread David Nyström
On mån 3 feb 2014 14:03:47, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi David, On Monday 03 February 2014 13:58:49 David Nyström wrote: An intended fix for below error message with core-image-lsb, Sending this as an RFC since I dont really know what constitutes a RRECOMMENDS vs. RDEPENDS. Is this clearly defined

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] udev: add udev-utils to RDEPENDS

2014-02-03 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 13:58 +0100, David Nyström wrote: An intended fix for below error message with core-image-lsb, Sending this as an RFC since I dont really know what constitutes a RRECOMMENDS vs. RDEPENDS. Is this clearly defined somewhere ? Below should be an RDEPENDS, no ? INIT:

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] udev: add udev-utils to RDEPENDS

2014-02-03 Thread David Nyström
On mån 3 feb 2014 14:43:53, Phil Blundell wrote: On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 13:58 +0100, David Nyström wrote: An intended fix for below error message with core-image-lsb, Sending this as an RFC since I dont really know what constitutes a RRECOMMENDS vs. RDEPENDS. Is this clearly defined somewhere ?

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] udev: add udev-utils to RDEPENDS

2014-02-03 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:21:26PM +0100, David Nyström wrote: On mån 3 feb 2014 14:03:47, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi David, On Monday 03 February 2014 13:58:49 David Nyström wrote: An intended fix for below error message with core-image-lsb, Sending this as an RFC since I dont really