Re: [OE-core] [RFC] Allarch and packagegroup improvement proposal

2014-08-19 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 18 aug. 2014, om 17:35 heeft Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org het volgende geschreven: On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 15:39 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 15:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Well then maybe that allarch package with perl dependency shouldn't be

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] Allarch and packagegroup improvement proposal

2014-08-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 12:41 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 18 aug. 2014, om 17:35 heeft Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org het volgende geschreven: On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 15:39 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 15:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Well then maybe

[OE-core] [RFC] Allarch and packagegroup improvement proposal

2014-08-18 Thread Richard Purdie
As some people are already painfully aware, the current way packagegroup and allarch interact with the sstate signatures is painful. Some example problem cases: * An allarch package of scripts with an interpretor dependency (e.g perl) * A packagegroup with dependencies on something which is

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] Allarch and packagegroup improvement proposal

2014-08-18 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:46:50PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: As some people are already painfully aware, the current way packagegroup and allarch interact with the sstate signatures is painful. Some example problem cases: * An allarch package of scripts with an interpretor dependency

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] Allarch and packagegroup improvement proposal

2014-08-18 Thread Robert Yang
On 08/18/2014 09:14 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:46:50PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: As some people are already painfully aware, the current way packagegroup and allarch interact with the sstate signatures is painful. Some example problem cases: * An allarch package

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] Allarch and packagegroup improvement proposal

2014-08-18 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 09:42:50PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote: On 08/18/2014 09:14 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:46:50PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: As some people are already painfully aware, the current way packagegroup and allarch interact with the sstate

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] Allarch and packagegroup improvement proposal

2014-08-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 15:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:46:50PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: As some people are already painfully aware, the current way packagegroup and allarch interact with the sstate signatures is painful. Some example problem cases: *

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] Allarch and packagegroup improvement proposal

2014-08-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 15:39 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 15:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Well then maybe that allarch package with perl dependency shouldn't be marked as allarch. Take a step back and think about this from the end user system perspective. The