Hello, colleagues,
While debugging some stuff in oe-core company I've noticed that
lot's of packages
either don't use INC_PR, or misuse it (e.g. .inc has INC_PR, but then
.bb just defines PR = rX).
From my previous experience with oe-dev, I found INC_PR very usefull
and error-prone feature.
On 9/20/11 2:04 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Hello, colleagues,
While debugging some stuff in oe-core company I've noticed that
lot's of packages
either don't use INC_PR, or misuse it (e.g. .inc has INC_PR, but then
.bb just defines PR = rX).
I've noticed similar things. I'd agree,
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:10 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/20/11 2:04 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Hello, colleagues,
While debugging some stuff in oe-core company I've noticed that
lot's of packages
either don't use INC_PR, or misuse it (e.g. .inc has INC_PR, but then
.bb just
Op 20 sep 2011, om 22:30 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:10 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/20/11 2:04 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Hello, colleagues,
While debugging some stuff in oe-core company I've noticed that
lot's of packages
either don't
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 22:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 20 sep 2011, om 22:30 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:10 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/20/11 2:04 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Hello, colleagues,
While debugging some stuff in oe-core
