Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-24 Thread Martin Jansa
> That leaves only few issues in our internal components and strange failure > with perf which fails to include various header files: > perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/util/include/asm/byteorder.h:2:10: fatal > error: ../../../../include/uapi/linux/swab.h: No such file or directory > perf/1.0-r9/

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-17 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 09:11:45PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > > 5) nativesdk-libxcrypt fails to build (not sure which change caused >> > > this, it build OK with sumo since the -std=gnu99 addition. >> > > ../git/crypt-sunmd5.c:189:13: err

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-17 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 09:11:45PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > 5) nativesdk-libxcrypt fails to build (not sure which change caused > > > this, it build OK with sumo since the -std=gnu99 addition. > > > ../git/crypt-sunmd5.c:189:13: error: 'snprintf' output may be truncated > > > before the l

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-14 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:33:41AM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote: > On 10 May 2018 at 12:53, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > Thanks for testing > > > > On 5/10/18 7:34 AM, Dan McGregor wrote: > >> > >> On 4 May 2018 at 18:26, Khem Raj wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi All > >>> > >>> As you might have notice

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-14 Thread Dan McGregor
On 10 May 2018 at 12:53, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for testing > > On 5/10/18 7:34 AM, Dan McGregor wrote: >> >> On 4 May 2018 at 18:26, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> Hi All >>> >>> As you might have noticed that gcc 8.1 was released this week, I am >>> calling out for some testing help on t

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-13 Thread Khem Raj
Hi Ross I pushed a few more fixes to branch which fixes kernel build issue ovmf build issue python2 build issue (your fix) I could not reproduce the mesa issues that is shown on AB With this I think we should be in better shape. Can you retry http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-cont

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-11 Thread Khem Raj
Hi Ross Thanks for testing I looked at failures and one of them is RESULTS - kernelmodule.KernelModuleTest.test_kernel_module - Testcase 1541: FAILED and this is the compile error. pager.c: In function 'pager_preexec': pager.c:36:12: error: passing argument 2 to restrict-qualified parameter al

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-11 Thread Burton, Ross
I threw the branch at the Yocto Project autobuilder today, produced a number of failures: http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Latest//?filter=b23dba19607412c8cc7d267d95354d65f5631088&type=commit Ross On 5 May 2018 at 01:26, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi All > > As you might have noticed that gcc 8.1 w

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 201

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, M

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa >>> wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>>

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>>

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa >>> wrote: >>> > see >>> > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/ope

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:11:00PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa >

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:11:00PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa > >> wrote: > >> > see > >> > http://lists.openembedded.org/

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > see >> > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-May/150654.html >> >> Removing -fno-omit-frame

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > see > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-May/150654.html > > Removing -fno-omit-frame-pointer isn't the same as adding > -fomit-frame-pointer. Fr

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > see > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-May/150654.html Removing -fno-omit-frame-pointer isn't the same as adding -fomit-frame-pointer. Frame pointers may get enabled depending on the optimisation level etc (ie no

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Martin Jansa
see http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-May/150654.html On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:38 AM Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Martin Jansa > wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:43:25PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:27:

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:43:25PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:27:50PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Martin Jansa >> > wrote: >> > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:50:02AM -0700,

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:43:25PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:27:50PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Martin Jansa >> > wrote: >> > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:50:02AM -0700,

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:43:25PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:27:50PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Martin Jansa > > wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:50:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > >> Hi Martin > > >> > > >> Thanks for te

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:27:50PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:50:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> Hi Martin > >> > >> Thanks for testing and reporting back > >> > >> On 5/9/18 2:38 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > >>

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:50:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> Hi Martin >> >> Thanks for testing and reporting back >> >> On 5/9/18 2:38 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > My initial tests show couple issues, but usually caused by other changes >> >

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:50:02AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi Martin > > Thanks for testing and reporting back > > On 5/9/18 2:38 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > My initial tests show couple issues, but usually caused by other changes > > in that branch, not the gcc-8 itself. > > > > 1) strace-4.2

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Khem Raj
Hi Dan, Thanks for testing On 5/10/18 7:34 AM, Dan McGregor wrote: On 4 May 2018 at 18:26, Khem Raj wrote: Hi All As you might have noticed that gcc 8.1 was released this week, I am calling out for some testing help on testing branch so we can weed out issues you might see in your setups. so

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Khem Raj
Hi Martin Thanks for testing and reporting back On 5/9/18 2:38 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: My initial tests show couple issues, but usually caused by other changes in that branch, not the gcc-8 itself. 1) strace-4.22 from http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/gcc-8

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-10 Thread Dan McGregor
On 4 May 2018 at 18:26, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi All > > As you might have noticed that gcc 8.1 was released this week, I am > calling out for some testing help on testing branch so we can weed out > issues you might see in your setups. so if you have your > builders idling over weekend, then you know

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-09 Thread Martin Jansa
My initial tests show couple issues, but usually caused by other changes in that branch, not the gcc-8 itself. 1) strace-4.22 from http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/gcc-8&id=af33a8b721cc9caebd3f5226b4c5903f666ab654 fails to build with ptest enabled (it builds wit

[OE-core] [RFT] GCC 8.1

2018-05-04 Thread Khem Raj
Hi All As you might have noticed that gcc 8.1 was released this week, I am calling out for some testing help on testing branch so we can weed out issues you might see in your setups. so if you have your builders idling over weekend, then you know what they can do this weekend :) Highlighted chang